<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Social Web TV - Latest Comments in Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://thesocialwebtv.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thesocialwebtv.disqus.com/episode_31_on_the_road_at_transparencycamp/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:58:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://www.thesocialweb.tv/blog/2009/03/transparency-camp.html#comment-7596239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lawyers Yearning To Be Sane is a Facebook group that focuses on stressors that tend to drive attorneys crazy. One of those stressors is judicial corruption. There is "no" transparency in our third branch of government, the courts. The judicial branch of government is our least democratic branch of our democracy. Because Congress has abdicated so many of its responsibilities, our courts have taken on a policy role never envisioned by the framers of our Constitution. The need for transparency or "government in the sunshine" in our courts is pressing. I am hopeful that TransparencyCamp will not forget to look at the people's need for online meaningful information about our judges and the courts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Catherine W. Real&lt;br&gt;Attorney at Law&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.catherinewreal.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.catherinewreal.com"&gt;http://www.catherinewreal.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sareal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:58:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://www.thesocialweb.tv/blog/2009/03/transparency-camp.html#comment-7079624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good video ... I didn't know, how fascinating. I'll watch some of the other videos perhaps it will become clear&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CompensationUK</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:41:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://www.thesocialweb.tv/blog/2009/03/transparency-camp.html#comment-6999378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great to see you there Dave ... we missed Chris @ dinner!  See you at SXSW!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:22:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://www.thesocialweb.tv/blog/2009/03/transparency-camp.html#comment-6980244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When most gov't agency sites that I've been to feel like they were made in '95, it's hard to imagine any of them pursuing a newer concept like OpenID. I'm guessing that has something to do with low web budgets, so maybe TransparencyCamp should be part fund raiser. :P Obama's site is pretty clean though, so maybe there's hope yet. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Heffernan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://www.thesocialweb.tv/blog/2009/03/transparency-camp.html#comment-6874230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this was the first TransparencyCamp and it was largely focused on the Federal level given that it was in DC.  It sounds like more are being planned both in DC and elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Recordon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://www.thesocialweb.tv/blog/2009/03/transparency-camp.html#comment-6874004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love the outro music, very saucy. How many TransparencyCamps are there? Are you trying to focus on the federal level or state level?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake Lumetta</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>